The aim is to reach an agreement, at least partial, on each point on the list. If you approach the exercise on the basis of the following guidelines, you will improve your chances of consensus: Mutual agreement procedure In the event of difficulties or doubts between the parties as to the implementation or interpretation of this Agreement, the parties will endeavour to resolve the issue by mutual agreement. In order to reach mutual agreement before the contract is concluded, the structure and requirements of the treaty will be clarified during contract negotiations. The final language of the treaty should reflect all agreements reached. Issues covered include jurisdiction and public authorities, applicable conditions and laws, technical and economic approaches, property rights, contractual financing, technical solution, global payments and prices. In the case of complex purchasing positions, contract negotiation can be an independent process with its own inputs (for example. B a list of outings or “open item lists”) and his own achievements (for example. B documented decisions). For simple purchasing positions, contractual terms can be fixed and non-negotiable and must be accepted only by the selected supplier. It is often difficult to reach mutual agreement through a negotiation process.
This article explains how institutions can reduce this difficulty. It begins with a fundamental dichotomy of bargaining situations between zero-sum and mixed-sum cases. This dichotomy is then linked to the diversity of products – public, CPR, club and private – that the players want to manufacture through negotiation. The article then systematically links goods and institutions, with an emphasis on international regimes and international organizations. Finally, the problem of the creation of institutions is examined from different analytical angles. Mutual agreement is a protection of sexual integrity imposed by the state under penalty of sanctions. The validity of the mutual termination contract does not depend on some form. Therefore, a reciprocal termination agreement can be executed either explicitly or implicitly, orally or in writing. In the absence of a form required to be valid, the form of the agreement is of great importance to the evidence.
It would therefore be advantageous to implement in writing a reciprocal termination agreement in order to demonstrate the common will of the parties to terminate the employment contract. The most important condition for the performance of a valid reciprocal termination contract is the existence of “reasonable performance criteria” arising from the court decision. The Supreme Court applies the validity of the reciprocal termination contract to the existence of a reasonable benefit from the worker`s point of view. The main reason for the Supreme Court`s “reasonable utility” criteria in reciprocal termination agreements is that, since the worker is granted termination of the employment contract by the employer with severance pay and severance pay, the preference for another method, which is not more advantageous, cannot be considered appropriate at the normal stage of his life.